Tesco fails in Court of Appeal bid - Leigh Day
Lawyers representing tens of thousands of supermarket workers have welcomed a ruling on how tribunals should assess the value of Tesco shop worker roles.
www.leighday.co.ukHere’s the latest I can provide based on reputable outlets up to May 2026.
Court of Appeal ruling (May 12, 2026): The Court of Appeal largely upheld previous tribunals’ approach to the Tesco equal-pay case and dismissed most of Tesco’s grounds of appeal. The decision addressed procedural aspects of how the equal-value exercise should be conducted and what evidence tribunals may rely on; it did not itself determine whether Tesco underpaid shop staff. This represents a procedural win for the claimants, potentially shaping the path toward the final equal-pay liability, which could run into billions if the underlying pay gap is proven.[3][4][5]
Context of the dispute: The claimants argue that predominantly female store staff were paid less than predominantly male distribution-centre staff for work of equal value. Tesco contends that tribunals have relied on an appropriate methodology, and has sought to introduce expert evidence to explain pay differences via market forces, among other arguments. The appeal focused on how job roles are evaluated and what evidence is admissible, not on the ultimate determination of equal pay entitlement.[4][5][3]
Earlier and related developments: Tesco has previously sought to overturn or delay decisions in the ongoing £4bn-plus dispute, with multiple rounds in courts and tribunals since 2018. The appellate process has involved discussions around the validity of Tesco’s job-evaluation studies and the comparators used in assessing value of work.[5][3][4]
What this could mean going forward
If you’d like, I can summarize the key points from the Court of Appeal judgment in plain-language and outline what comes next in the tribunal schedule, or track any new developments as they are reported. I can also provide a quick one-page briefing for a meeting or shareable summary. Please tell me your preference.
Citations:
Lawyers representing tens of thousands of supermarket workers have welcomed a ruling on how tribunals should assess the value of Tesco shop worker roles.
www.leighday.co.ukTesco has returned to court this week seeking to overturn a legal decision in its ongoing £4bn equal pay dispute.
www.retailgazette.co.ukTesco has returned to court this week seeking to overturn a legal decision in its ongoing £4bn equal pay dispute. The supermarket giant is facing claims from around 49,000 current and former store workers, mainly women, who allege they are paid less than male-dominated distribution centre staff for work of equal value. The case, which first launched in 2018 by law firms Harcus Parker and Leigh Day, has already passed through several Employment T…
ground.newsShop floor staff, most of them women, accused Tesco of paying them up to £3 per hour less than the mostly male warehouse workers.
news.sky.comLaw firm Leigh Day is reviewing a decision made yesterday (Wednesday, 14th October) by the Employment Tribunal that a job evaluation study carried out by Tesco is unreliable.
www.leighday.co.ukTesco is back in court this week seeking to overturn a key legal decision in its ongoing £4bn equal pay dispute.
www.grocerygazette.co.ukTesco’s efforts to appeal against a major equal pay dispute with around 55,000 claimants have been delayed by an 'elephant behind a screen'.
hrandbenefits.co.ukAn employment tribunal has ruled that a study, conducted by Tesco reward managers in 2014, which evaluated 22 store roles against higher paid distribution roles, was not a valid job…
londonlovesbusiness.comShop workers win latest round in battle for pay parity with warehouse staff, but the central question of whether predominantly female store workers were underpaid remains unresolved.
iclg.com